Canadian Professor Fired for Questioning Safety of mRNA Injections

🌈 Abstract

The article discusses the case of Dr. Patrick Provost, a professor at Université Laval in Canada, who was fired for questioning the safety of mRNA COVID-19 injections. It highlights the university's preference for orthodoxy over scientific inquiry and draws parallels to the historical persecution of Galileo. The article argues that the COVID-19 injections have led to the overturning of centuries-old principles of how we relate to one another, and suggests that Canada may be confident in never having to admit any wrongdoing.

🙋 Q&A

[01] Canadian Professor Fired for Questioning Safety of mRNA Injections

1. What are the key points regarding Dr. Patrick Provost's case?

• Dr. Patrick Provost, a professor of Microbiology and Immunology at Université Laval, was fired for questioning the safety of mRNA COVID-19 injections.
• The university's decision to fire Provost is seen as a preference for orthodoxy over scientific inquiry, drawing parallels to the historical persecution of Galileo.
• The article argues that the COVID-19 injections have led to the overturning of centuries-old principles of how we relate to one another, such as bullying, coercion, deception, discrimination, censorship, and persecution.

2. What is the historical context provided in the article?

• The article mentions that since Galileo was condemned by the Inquisition in 1633, there has been a trend in the West to favor free speech and free scientific inquiry over strict enforcement of religious orthodoxy.
• It references John Milton's defense of free speech in his work "Areopagitica," which the article suggests should be required reading for those interested in the advancement of knowledge.

3. What is the message to the Laval University leaders?

• The article criticizes the university's decision to fire Provost, stating that regressing to a 16th-century preference for orthodoxy and persecuting a professor for "heresy" is a terrible policy for a 21st-century university.
• The article suggests that the university will eventually be shown to be on the wrong side of intellectual and political history.

4. What does the article suggest about Canada's stance on the COVID-19 injections?

• The article suggests that Canada may be confident that it will never have to admit any wrongdoing related to the COVID-19 injections, implying that there may be something "brewing" that the public is unaware of.